Ros suggests various ways in which the Government could organise compensation for those who have suffered losses as a result of scheme wind-ups – the Government does not have to fund it all from taxpayers’ money.
Document submitted to High Court outlining the case for Judicial Review of the Government’s unprecedented rejection of both the findings and recommendations of the Parliamentary Ombudsman’s report.
Article published in Financial Adviser giving criticising the Government’s attempts to squirm out of taking responsibility for occupational pensions policy errors, despite the Parliamentary Ombudsman’s report showing its guilt in this affair.
Letter published in Professional Pensions magazine, calling on the Government to compensate victims of scheme wind-ups urgently.
Ros highlights why the full, final response to the Parliamentary Ombudsman’s report is flawed, going through the full response and highlighting where the arguments are not correct.
Ros comments on the full, final response, presented in the House of Commons by John Hutton, outlining more details about the Government’s reasons for rejecting the Parliamentary Ombdusman’s report.
Papers submitted by Ros to the Commons Public Administration Select Committee, ahead of her evidence to the inquiry.
Ros explains the shortcomings of the Financial Assistance Scheme – even after the announcement of aextensions’ to the coverage.
Note explaining why the announced aextension’ of the Financial Assistance Scheme is little more than a public relations exercise, designed to buy backbench silence, rather than helping those who have lost their pensions.
Paper prepared for Parliamentary Work and Pensions Select Committee explaining the inadequacies of the announced extensions to the Financial Assistance Scheme.