Press Release on Pension Protection Fund investment principles
Press Release giving Ros’ view on the Statement of Investment Principles announced by the Pension Protection Fund Board
Press Release giving Ros’ view on the Statement of Investment Principles announced by the Pension Protection Fund Board
Presentation to the Savings Market conference in London, entitled aRadically Rethinking Retirement, New approaches for the 21st Century’ discussing Ros’s views that we need to reconsider what we expect from both retirement and pensions, in order to be able to move forward on pension reform.
The Herald newspaper explains why many people do not have sufficient financial information or education to be able to make good pension decisions
Article to be published in Pensions World magazine, explaining why women’s pensions need to be reformed urgently and how the system currently discriminates against women.
Powerpoint description of a possible structured product approach to overcoming pension fund deficits and meeting liabilities over time.
Letter published in the Financial Times suggesting that there is no intellectual case for compelling employers to contribute to pensions, that this is simply a form of taxation and that pension contributions should really be up to the individual.
Article prepared for Financial Adviser giving Ros’s reaction to the pension reform proposals contained in the Pensions Commission final report.
Press Release explaining why contracting out should be abolished as part of radical pension reform and most providers are already advising their clients that they should not remain contracted out.
Press Release explaining that winter fuel and other benefits for pensioners are costing over half as much as Pension Credit, yet are not targeted at all and asking whether this is a sensible use of taxpayers’ money.
Press Release discussing Ros’s view that the government’s climbdown on allowing residential property into personal pensions and last-minute changes of pension simplification tax rules is the right decision but dreadful timing. The Government should never have proposed this and should have listened to warnings over the last 2 years that such changes would lead to huge losses of tax revenue.