Q & A - how Government caused the injustices of wind-up - Ros Altmann
  • ROS ALTMANN

    Ros is a leading authority on later life issues, including pensions,
    social care and retirement policy. Numerous major awards have recognised
    her work to demystify finance and make pensions work better for people.
    She was the UK Pensions Minister from 2015 – 16 and is a member
    of the House of Lords where she sits as Baroness Altmann of Tottenham.

  • Ros Altmann

    Ros Altmann

    Q & A – how Government caused the injustices of wind-up

    Q & A – how Government caused the injustices of wind-up

    Q & A – how Government caused the injustices of wind-up

    by Dr. Ros Altmann

    (All material on this page is subject to copyright and must not be reproduced without the author’s permission.)


    Did Government encourage people to join these schemes and stay in them?       
    Yes

    Did Government tell members their pensions were safe and protected by law?   
    Yes

    Did Government introduce new risks to member security in 1997?                                  
    Yes

    Did Government determine the rules of wind-up which have taken members’ contributions away and given the money to others?                                                      
    Yes

    Did Government know members and trustees were unaware of wind-up risks?
    Yes

    Did Government say it would issue ‘impartial information’ explaining the benefits
    and risks of pensions?                                                                                                           
    Yes

    Did Government explain the risks (especially of wind-up) to the public?             
    No

    Could trustees alter the rules of wind-up to divide assets more fairly?                  
    No

    Did Government say the MFR would ensure full pensions on wind-up?              
    Yes

    Could trustees get any more money into their scheme than MFR?                                  
    No

    Did Government keep the MFR up to its original intention?                                             
    No

    Did Government consider risks to workers’ pensions when changing MFR?       
    No

    Did Government tell people they should take individual advice?                           
    No

    Did Government give older workers a chance to diversify their pension risks?    
    No

    Did any other countries leave such pension schemes unprotected?                                   
    No

    Did Government get people to put their state pension rights into these schemes?           
    No

    Did Government call pensions from these rights ‘Guaranteed Minimum Pension’?        
    Yes

    Were these pension losses caused because the employer went bust?                     
    No

    Why have people lost their pensions?            
    Because of inadequate official funding standards and unfair wind-up rules

    Why did people believe their pensions were absolutely safe and protected by law?
    Because the Government told them so

    Why were people relying totally on their company pension scheme?           
    Because Government would not let them have another pension, but assured them it was safe, so they put all their retirement savings into it

    Why has the Government refused to admit its responsibility for what happened?          
    Don’t know

    Leave a Reply